ROTHENBERG

v.

AMALGAMATED SUGAR CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sanders Confectionery Prods., Inc. v. Heller Fin., Inc., 973 F.2d 474 (6th Cir. 1992)
  …Cent. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 790 F. 2d 524, 530 (6th Cir.1986) (adequacy of representation in class action). Relying on Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Industries, Inc., 825 F. 2d 634 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Rothenburg v. Amalgamated Sugar Co., 484 U.S. 992, 108 S.Ct. 511, 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987), the district court held that “the board of directors of SCPI owed a fiduciary duty to represent Merigian and the other shareholders and, absent bad faith, collusion, or negligence by the board, the stockholder…
• SMA Life Assurance Co. v. Sanchez-Pica, 960 F.2d 274 (1st Cir. 1992)
  …ecessary to effectuate a judgment of the federal court and prevent the relitigation of issues that the federal court has already decided. Id. Appellant justifiably cites Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Indus. Inc., 825 F. 2d 634 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 992, 108 S.Ct. 511, 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987), as an example of this exception. In rendering her decision, Judge Cerezo was aware of this exception to the Anti-Injunction Act. Indeed, the judge believed that the Anti-Injunction Act did not apply to this ca…
• Goodheart Clothing Co., Inc. v. Laura Goodman Enters., Inc., 962 F.2d 268 (2d Cir. 1992)
  …ue “turns upon such factors as the nature of the decision (i.e., that it was not avowedly tentative), the adequacy of the hearing, and the opportunity for review.” Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. NL Indus., Inc., 825 F. 2d 634, 642 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 992, 108 S.Ct. 511, 98 L.Ed.2d 511 (1987), was decided on other grounds, so we accordingly found “no need to consider the interesting argument based on Judge Friendly’s decision in [Lummus ] that the preliminary injunction [considered in Amalgamated ] c…