ABBOTT

v.

INDIANA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Terzado-Madruga, 897 F.2d 1099 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …that the judge assure himself of the plea’s factual basis is but one of several ways the rule ensures that a guilty plea results from a voluntary and intelligent decision.” United States v. Gomez-Gomez, 822 F. 2d 1008 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1028, 108 S.Ct. 755, 98 L.Ed.2d 767 (1988). Appellant concedes that Rule 11 does not directly apply to the states. While the courts have not decided whether a factual basis is a constitutional requirement for accepting a plea, we find that the district…
• Clark Davenport Snell v. Conley Tunnell, 920 F.2d 673 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …this circuit has granted absolute immunity to probation officers who allegedly made false statements in a pretrial bond report and a presentence report. Tripati v. United States INS, 784 F. 2d 345, 347-48 (10th Cir.1986) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1028, 108 S.Ct. 755, 98 L.Ed.2d 767 (1988). And some courts have reached results in which both social workers involved in child protection and probation officers were accorded the same type of immunity, whether it be absolute or qualified. Hodorowski, 84…
• United States v. Cameron, 907 F.2d 1051 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …urt’s refusal to excuse a defendant from compliance with Rule 12.-2(a) “for cause shown” is reviewable under an abuse of discretion standard. See, e.g., United States v. Cox, 826 F. 2d 1518, 1522-1523 (6th Cir.1987) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1028, 108 S.Ct. 756, 98 L.Ed.2d 768 (1988). Under our view of the facts of this case the question is not whether the district court abused its discretion in denying appellant relief for her failure to give notice under Rule 12.2(a) altogether; the quest…