DINICOLA
v.
PENNSYLVANIA
DINICOLA
PENNSYLVANIA
484 U.S. 1028
Supreme Court of the United States (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Russ v. Uppah, 972 F.2d 300 (10th Cir. 1992)…nity Upah is entitled, we must employ a “functional” approach. See Valdez, 878 F. 2d at 1287. When performing functions that are “quasi-judicial” in nature, see, e.g., Tripati v. INS, 784 F. 2d 345, 347-48 (10th Cir.1986) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1028, 108 S.Ct. 755, 98 L.Ed.2d 767 (1988), Upah is entitled to absolute immunity. However, “decisions involving the revocation of probation or parole by a probation or parole officer warrant only qualified, not absolute, immunity.” Snell v. Tunnell, 920…