CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION OF DELAWARE

v.

SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 507 U.S. 380 (U.S. 1993)
  …despite counsel’s affirmative efforts to comply and inadvertence which results from counsel’s lack of diligence”) (Fed. Rule App. Proc. 4(a)), cert. denied sub nom. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Secretary of Transp. of Pennsylvania, 484 U. S. 1032 (1988). In my view, we need not resolve that dispute in this case. Once we properly clarify the factors that are relevant to the excusable neglect determination, the Bankruptcy Court’s findings compel the conclusion that respondents’ neglect was i…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Shendock v. Dir., Off. OF Workers' Comp. Programs. Appeal of Stephen Shendock, 893 F.2d 1458 (3d Cir. 1990)
  …ons in Bechtel v. Robinson, 886 F. 2d 644 (3d Cir.1989), and Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Larson, 827 F. 2d 916, 920 (3d Cir.1987) (counsel’s inadvertent misdirection of notice of appeal to adjacent district court held excusable), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1032, 108 S.Ct. 762, 98 L.Ed.2d 775 (1988). See also Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) (per curiam) (pleadings drafted by pro se litigants must be held to less stringent standards). Equitable tolling or estoppel simply…
• Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Schneiderman, 940 F.2d 911 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …not doubt is regularly used to file proofs of claims rather than a neglectful oversight. The conduct here thus may be contrasted with the excusable neglect found in Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Larson, 827 F. 2d 916 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1032, 108 S.Ct. 762, 98 L.Ed.2d 775 (1988), in which a notice of appeal was filed in the wrong district because the notice was erroneously prepared. Furthermore, assuming that we could consider the conduct of the postal authorities or the office of the c…