LEE ET AL.

v.

EKLUTNA, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Love v. United States, 871 F.2d 1488 (9th Cir. 1989)
• United States v. Long, 900 F.2d 1270 (8th Cir. 1990)
  …new complaint or indictment on the same charge, the 30-day period runs from the second complaint or indictment. United States v. Abernathy, 688 F. 2d 576, 579 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Hutchins, 818 F. 2d 322, 325-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041, 108 S.Ct. 772, 98 L.Ed.2d 859 (1987); United States v. Puett, 735 F. 2d 1331, 1333-34 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. Samples, 713 F. 2d 298, 302-03 (7th Cir.1983); United States v. Bit [*1274] tle, 699 F. 2d 1201, 1205-06 (D.C.Cir.1983). We need…
• Seldovia Native Ass'n, Inc. v. Lujan, 904 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …existing right. It also protects the Native Alaskans’ rights to their full allotment of land under section 1613 of ANCSA. In Lee v. United States, 629 F.Supp. 721 (D.Alaska 1985), aff'd on other grounds, 809 F. 2d 1406 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1041, 108 S.Ct. 772, 98 L.Ed.2d 859 (1988), the district court reviewed the Secretary’s construction of section 22(b). Section 22(b) protects claims made under the federal homestead laws. 43 U.S.C. § 1621(b). As a result, there was no dispute that these…