PROUD

v.

GREYCAS, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Harris, 959 F.2d 246 (D.C. Cir. 1992)
  …possession of certain particularly dangerous guns to all guns. The circuits are split on this issue. The government’s position has been accepted in five circuits, see United States v. Shilling, 826 F. 2d 1365, 1367-68 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043, 108 S.Ct. 777, 98 L.Ed.2d 863 (1988); United States v. Gonzalez, 719 F. 2d 1516, 1522 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1037, 104 S.Ct. 1312, 79 L.Ed.2d 710 (1984); .Morgan v. United States, 564 F. 2d 803, 805 (8th Cir.1977); United States v.…
• Gilbert v. City OF Cambridge, 932 F.2d 51 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …rely on the futility exception until he or she makes at least one meaningful application” for administrative relief. Herrington, 857 F. 2d at 569; Kinzli v. Santa Cruz, 818 F. 2d 1449, 1454-55 (9th Cir.), amended, 830 F. 2d 968 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043, 108 S.Ct. 775, 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); see also Unity Ventures v. Lake County, 841 F. 2d 770, 775-76 (7th Cir.) (Seventh Circuit applies same rule to find due process claim unripe), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 891, 109 S.Ct. 226, 102 L.Ed.2d 216 (1988).…
• Nasierowski Bros. Inv. Co. v. City OF Sterling Heights, 949 F.2d 890 (6th Cir. 1991)
  …subject to finality requirements); Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz, 818 F. 2d 1449, 1456 (9th Cir.) (procedural due process claim cannot be raised because linked to unripe substantive due process claim), as amended, 830 F. 2d 968 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1043, 108 S.Ct. 775, 98 L.Ed.2d 861 (1988); Norco Constr., Inc. v. King Cty., 801 F. 2d 1143, 1145 (9th Cir.1986) (final decision requirement applicable to procedural due process claim). The majority analogizes Nasierowski’s facts to Harris, 904 F. 2d…