RANDALL W. DOWNEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ON MOTION TO DISMISS
Notice of this criminal appeal was filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court in and for Pasco County 303 days after the entry of the judgment and sentence sought to be reviewed and 265 days after the entry of the order denying a motion for mitigation and some 224 days following the last docket entry in the Criminal Court progress docket in this case.
As this is a criminal case, appellant had a 90-day period in which to file his notice of appeal by the rules then in effect. FAR 6.2, 1962 Revision as amended 1965, 32 F.S.A. Clearly, the notice of appeal herein was not timely filed. We are, thus, without jurisdiction over this cause and must grant the motion to dismiss.
It is so ordered.
HOBSON, A. C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hoskin v. Hoskin, 349 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…former wife, having accepted the final judgment which clearly indi- [*758] cated the agreement to sell the property, cannot claim, at this late date, that the final judgment, the benefits of which she has accepted, is invalid. See Hunter v. Hunter, 221 So. 2d 189 (Fla.3d DCA 1969). The court retains jurisdiction to enforce the executory provisions contained in a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. See Sapp v. Sapp, 275 So. 2d 43 (Fla.2d DCA 1973). See also Brasch v. Brasch, 109 So. 2d 584 (Fla.3d DCA…
-
Barsumian v. Barsumian, 235 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)…n the obligation of the husband from the beginning and the wife recompensed accordingly. This is, as exactly reflected in the agreement, contrary to its terms. In conclusion, the wife contends that the recent case of Hunter v. Hunter, Fla.App.1969, 221 So. 2d 189, is dispositive of the instant case. In Hunter there was no written contract, but the husband made regular payments which the wife accepted for over a year. Being then dissatisfied, the wife asked for a judicial award. The court refused to intermedd…
-
Markham v. Markham, 222 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)…he agreement was fair and adequate,1 and it ill behooves her to attempt to set it aside after accepting the benefits of the settlement, particularly with not even an offer to return the parties to the status quo. See: Hunter v. Hunter, Fla.App.1969, 221 So. 2d 189; Stehli v. Thompson, 151 Fla. 566, 10 So. 2d 123. Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the order here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed. . Kahn v. Kahn, Fla.1955, 78 So. 2d 367; Platt v. Platt, Fla.App.1958, 103 So. 2d 253; Sande…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence