GOEL ET AL.

v.

ENTRE COMPUTER CENTERS, INC.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Americans United FOR Separation OF Church & State v. City OF Grand Rapids, 980 F.2d 1538 (6th Cir. 1992)
  …able young minds....’” Mozert v. Hawkins County Bd. of Educ., 827 F. 2d 1058, 1072 (6th Cir.1987) (Kennedy, J., concurring) (quoting School Dist. of Grand Rapids v. Ball, 473 U.S. 373, 383, 105 S.Ct. 3216, 3222, 87 L.Ed.2d 267 (1985)), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1066, 108 S.Ct. 1029, 98 L.Ed.2d 993 (1988). See also Lee v. Weisman, — U.S. -, -, 112 S.Ct. 2649, 2658, 120 L.Ed.2d 467 (1992) (“[TJhere are heightened concerns with protecting freedom of conscience from subtle coercive pressure in the elementary and…
• The Movie 1 & 2 v. United Artists Commc'ns, Inc., 909 F.2d 1245 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …(9th Cir. 1985). Summary judgment is appropriate only in the clear absence of any significant probative evidence tending to support the complaint. Theee Movies of Tarzana v. Pacific Theatres, Inc., 828 F. 2d 1395, 1398 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1066, 108 S.Ct. 1028, 98 L.Ed.2d 992 (1988). III. DISCUSSION A. THE TRIAL COURT’S EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE 1. The Chiarrapotti Statements The appellant argues that the trial court erred in excluding from evidence Hal and David Snyder’s deposition testim…
• Stanley Duplantis and his wife v. Shell Offshore, Inc., 948 F.2d 187 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …meant that the nonmoving party could oppose a summary judgment motion using unauthenticated documents, see Bushman v. Halm, 798 F. 2d 651, 654 n. 5 (3d Cir.1986); Catrett v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 826 F. 2d 33, 38 (D.C.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1066, 108 S.Ct. 1028, 98 L.Ed.2d 992 (1988), when read in context, it is clear that the Supreme Court meant merely that full depositions were not required, and that other documents listed in Rule 56(c), such as “answers to interrogatories, and admissions…