WILLIAMS

v.

LYNAUGH, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By

• Lowery v. Young, 887 F.2d 1309 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …st assert that there was a “positive and demonstrable nexus between the current custody and the prior conviction.” Young v. Lynaugh, 821 F. 2d 1133, 1137 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986, 108 S.Ct. 503, 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1040, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988). In his Amendment to Traverse, Lowery asserted that his “habitual offender status [was] derived primarily from the prior 8-count forgery Georgia convictions.” Lowery also alleged in his Amendment to Traverse…
• Branch v. Lt. Randall A. Martin, 886 F.2d 1043 (8th Cir. 1989)
  …view on appeal and ordinarily will result in dismissal of the appeal pursuant to 8th Cir.R. 13, even if the appellant is proceeding pro se. See, e.g., Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters, 827 F. 2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988). In the present case, however, the lack of a transcript is a deficiency in the legal process that necessarily undermined the validity of the district court’s order of dismissal.…
• Allen v. Collins, 924 F.2d 88 (5th Cir. 1991)
  …conviction for which sentence had been completed when that conviction is used to enhance a subsequent sentence. Young v. Lynaugh, 821 F. 2d 1133, 1136-37 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 986, 108 S.Ct. 503, 98 L.Ed.2d 501 (1987), and cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1040, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988). We made no distinction between void and voidable convictions in Young. In fact, we permitted Young to challenge his prior conviction on the same ground alleged here by Allen: ineffective assistance of counsel…