UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
v.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS, AFL-CIO
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS, AFL-CIO
485 U.S. 680
Supreme Court of the United States (1988)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 99 L. Ed. 2d 770 · 108 S. Ct. 1589 · 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1979 · SCDB 1987-071
Cited by 9 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stead Motors OF Walnut Creek v. Auto. MacHinists Lodge NO. 1173, 886 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1989)…otherwise have the effect of mandating any illegal conduct' ”) (quoting American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Serv., 789 F. 2d 1, 8 (D.C.Cir.1986)), cert. granted, 484 U.S. 984, 108 S.Ct. 500, 98 L.Ed.2d 499 (1987), cert, dismissed, 485 U.S. 680, 108 S.Ct. 1589, 99 L.Ed.2d 770 (1988); see also E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Grasselli Emp. Ass’n., 790 F. 2d 611, 620 (7th Cir.) (”[t]he question is whether the contract, as construed, violates positive law”), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 853, 107 S.…1 / 2
-
United States Postal Serv. v. Nat'l Ass'n OF Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO, 847 F.2d 775 (11th Cir. 1988)…a, with United States Postal Service v. Nat’l. Assoc. of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO, 810 F. 2d 1239 (D.C.Cir.), petition for cert. granted, — U.S. - 108 S.Ct. 500, 98 L.Ed.2d 499 (1987), petition for cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1589, 99 L.Ed.2d 770 (1988) (award requiring reinstatement of postal employee convicted of unlawful delay of the mails held not violative of public policy), we af [*778] firm the district court on a different, but more established ground. See Securities…
-
Kermit Smith, Jr. v. Dixon, 996 F.2d 667 (4th Cir. 1993)…. Smith, Nos. 80 CRS 15265, 15266, 15271 (N.C.Super.Ct. Mar. 9, 1987). The Supreme Court of North Carolina denied certiorari, State v. Smith, 364 S.E. 2d 668 (N.C.1988), as did the United States Supreme Court, Smith v. North Carolina, 485 U.S. 1030, 108 S.Ct. 1589, 99 L.Ed.2d 903 (1988). . For simplicity, we refer to the reviewability of the heinousness issue only. The State argues that Smith defaulted on two additional claims (described infra): the McKoy claim, and the claim regarding Smith’s cross-examinat…