TERMINAL REALTY PENN CO.

v.

AUERBACH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• State v. Doering-Sachs, 652 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
  …at 80; see also Gerritsen v. Consulado Gen. De Mexico, 989 F. 2d 340, 346 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 95, 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Joseph v. Office of the Consulate Gen. of Nigeria, 830 F. 2d 1018, 1027 (9th Cir.1987), cert, denied, 485 U.S. 905, 108 S.Ct. 1077, 99 L.Ed.2d 236 (1988); Ford v. Clement, 834 F.Supp. 72 (S.D.N.Y.1993), affd, 29 F. 3d 621 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 449, 130 L.Ed.2d 359 (1994). At the time that the police arrested the defendant, he was in route…
• Arbour v. Jenkins, 903 F.2d 416 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …l claim affords no definite or enforceable property right until reduced to final judgment.” Sowell v. American Cyanamid Co., 888 F. 2d at 805 (citing In re Consol. United States Atmospheric Testing Litig., 820 F. 2d 982 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905, 108 S.Ct. 1076, 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988); Hammond v. United States, 786 F. 2d 8 (1st Cir.1986)). The heart of the Westfall Act lies in Sections 5 and 6. Section 5 amends 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b) to provide that the FTCA’s remedy against the United States…
• Sowell v. Am. Cyanamid Co., 888 F.2d 802 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …right of recovery against the individual defendants, placing the responsibility for their actions upon their employer, the government. See, e.g., In re Consol. United States Atmospheric Testing Litigation, 820 F. 2d 982 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 905, 108 S.Ct. 1076, 99 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988) (Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1985); Ducharme v. Merrill-National Laboratories, 574 F. 2d 1307 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1002, 99 S.Ct. 612, 58 L.Ed.2d 677 (1978) (Swine Flu Act); Carr v. United…

  ← 1 / 2 →