KOCH REFINING CO. ET AL.

v.

FARMERS UNION CENTRAL EXCHANGE, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Tucker v. Resha, 610 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …5. Some courts have followed the federal example and granted immediate review of non-final orders because appellate review would be futile. See Breault v. Chairman of Bd. of Fire Comm’nrs of Springfield, 401 Mass. 26, 513 N.E. 2d 1277, cert. den., 485 U.S. 906, 108 S.Ct. 1078, 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1987); Anderson. Others have denied relief based on the strict application of state appellate rules excluding such non-final orders from interlocutory review. See Klindtworth v. Burkett, 477 N.W. 2d 176 (N.D.1991); P…
• E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc. v. Hadley, 901 F.2d 979 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …(2d Cir.1989); Williams v. California 1st Bank, 859 F. 2d 664 (9th Cir.1988); Steyr-Daimler-Puch of America Corp. v. Pappas, 852 F. 2d 132 (4th Cir.1988); Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Cent. Exch., Inc., 831 F. 2d 1339 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906, 108 S.Ct. 1077, 99 L.Ed.2d 237 (1988); In re Ozark Restaurant Equip. Co., 816 F. 2d 1222 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 848, 108 S.Ct. 147, 98 L.Ed.2d 102 (1987); In re MortgageAmerica Corp., 714 F. 2d 1266 (5th Cir.1983). On the facts of thi…
• Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …mended complaint would also fail to withstand a motion to dismiss. Denials of leave to amend a complaint under Fed.R. Civ.P. 15(a) are reviewed for abuse of discretion. Kiser v. General Elec. Corp., 831 F. 2d 423, 426-27 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 906,108 S.Ct. 1078, 99 L.Ed.2d 238 (1988). However, reversal is proper when the district court bases its denial on an erroneous rule of law. Banks v. Wolk, 918 F. 2d 418, 419 (3d Cir.1990); Centifanti v. Nix, 865 F. 2d 1422, 1431 (3d Cir.1989). Since p…