KAPLAN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Alvaro Gamez v. State, 643 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …is added). See also United States v. Kaplan, 832 F. 2d 676 (1st Cir.1987) (holding if the witness intends to claim the privilege as to essentially all questions, the court may, in its discretion, refuse to allow him to take the stand), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 907, 108 S.Ct. 1080, 99 L.Ed.2d 239 (1988); United States v. Deutsch, 987 F. 2d 878 (2d Cir.1993) (holding the trial court has the discretion to prevent a party from calling a witness solely to have him or her invoke the fifth amendment). In this case…
• United States v. Filippo Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …piracy existed at the time the statement was made. We do not agree. Post-statement events may be used to prove that a statement was made during the course of a conspiracy. See United States v. Kaplan, 832 F. 2d 676, 685 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 907, 108 S.Ct. 1080, 99 L.Ed.2d 239 (1988). Having considered Carlo’s statements along with the other evidence discussed by the district court, 626 F.Supp. at 663, we conclude that the court did not err in determining that the requirement of Rule 801(d…
• United States v. Boylan, 898 F.2d 230 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …0. Parties must “clearly object,” Glenn, 828 F. 2d at 862, and their objections must be phrased with sufficient particularity to alert the trial court to the grounds asserted, United States v. Kaplan, 832 F. 2d 676, 682 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 907, 108 S.Ct. 1080, 99 L.Ed.2d 239 (1988); United States v. Harrigan, 586 F. 2d 860, 864 (1st Cir.1978). Appellants say they properly preserved continuity as a ground of appeal anent the charge. The record belies the claim. In the trial court, appella…