OKUN BROTHERS SHOE STORE, INC.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Bernal v. Lipp, 562 So. 2d 848 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …the trial court had the discretion to choose the- latter procedure, we see no basis on this record on which to exclude counsel. See United States v. Posner, 644 F.Supp. 885, 885-88 (S.D.Fla.1986), aff'd, 828 F. 2d 773 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 935, 108 S.Ct. 1110, 99 L.Ed.2d 271 (1988); accord Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co., 707 F.Supp. 1517, 1539-40 n. 24 (D.Minn.1989). See generally Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 74 S.Ct. 450, 98 L.Ed. 654 (1954). We therefore reverse and remand for…
• Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corp., 892 F.2d 1076 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …uestions of contract construction, a matter for the court. See Navigation Technology, 880 F. 2d at 1495; Boston Edison, 856 F. 2d at 365; Triple-A Baseball Club Assocs. v. Northeastern Baseball, Inc., 832 F. 2d 214, 220 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 935, 108 S.Ct. 1111, 99 L.Ed.2d 272 (1988); see also Zinchook v. Turkewycz, 128 Mich.App. 513, 340 N.W. 2d 844, 848 (1983) (contract construction is ordinarily a question of law for the court); cf. Craib, 233 N.W. 2d at 676 (where language used is incom…
• United States v. Drogoul, 1 F.3d 1546 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …29. The principal consideration guiding whether the absence of a particular witness’s testimony would produce injustice is the materiality of that testimony to the case. See United States v. Ismaili, 828 F. 2d 153, 159 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 935, 108 S.Ct. 1110, 99 L.Ed.2d 271 (1988); United States v. Johnpoll, 739 F. 2d 702, 709 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1075, 105 S.Ct. 571, 83 L.Ed.2d 511 (1984). When a prospective witness is unlikely to appear at trial and his or her testimony i…