PARHAM

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Hamblin, 911 F.2d 551 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …second prong of the Strickland test, our inquiry must end. Under these circumstances, the time lapse between the robbery and Jones’s alleged arrival at work is fatal to his claim. In Williams v. Weldon, 826 F. 2d 1018 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 964, 108 S.Ct. 1231, 99 L.Ed.2d 431 (1988), the defendant similarly sought to call alibi witnesses who could testify as to his presence a short time after certain robberies had occurred. We rejected a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in that c…
• United States v. Mendoza-Cecelia, 963 F.2d 1467 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …The evidence need not exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence or lead solely to a conclusion of guilt. United States v. Jones, 913 F. 2d 1552, 1557 (11th Cir.1990); United States v. Ospina, 823 F. 2d 429, 433 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 964, 108 S.Ct. 1232, 99 L.Ed.2d 432 (1988). To prove a conspiracy, the government must demonstrate that an agreement existed between two or more persons to commit a crime and that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily joined or participated in the i…
• United States v. Segun Ashimi, 932 F.2d 643 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …himi’s trial. . Cf. Hamblin, 911 F. 2d at 556 (failure to present alibi defense not prejudicial when alibi did not account for defendant’s presence at time of crime); Williams v. Weldon, 826 F. 2d 1018, 1022-23 (11th Cir.1987) (same), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 964, 108 S.Ct. 1231, 99 L.Ed.2d 431 (1988). . Ashimi has gone so far as to assert that Tucson is the only witness who could have corroborated the story about the loan, but this assertion appears to be contradicted by the record. Ashimi's own testimony…