WILLIAMS
v.
ARTHUR ET AL.
WILLIAMS
ARTHUR ET AL.
485 U.S. 967
Supreme Court of the United States (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Duprey, 895 F.2d 303 (7th Cir. 1989)…el of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation; and the length of time between the crime and the confrontation. Biggers, 409 U.S. at 199-200, 93 S.Ct. at 382-83; Dooley v. Duckworth, 832 F. 2d 445, 447 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 967, 108 S.Ct. 1239, 99 L.Ed.2d 438 (1988). Applying these factors, we find the following of particular significance. Ms. Gim-son testified that she observed the two men in the motel lobby for approximately five minutes. Her testimony indicates that he…
-
Galowski v. Murphy, 891 F.2d 629 (7th Cir. 1989)…Ct. 764, 769, 66 L.Ed.2d 722 (1981); Madyun v. Young, 852 F. 2d 1029, 1032 n. 1 (7th Cir.1988). This deference applies to factual findings of both trial and appellate courts. Dooley v. Duckworth, 832 F. 2d 445, 448 n. 3 (7th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 967, 108 S.Ct. 1239, 99 L.Ed.2d 438 (1988). After the post-conviction hearing, the court found that, having observed Ms. Sfasciotti’s demeanor, she was a credible witness. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals concluded that the trial court’s finding — that co…