CNA FINANCIAL CORP. ET AL.

v.

MCLAUGHLIN, SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Hanson v. Hanson, 678 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …s permitted to draft a judicial order without response by or notice to the opposing side, the temptation to overreach and exaggerate is overwhelming.” Colony Square Co. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 819 F. 2d 272 (11th Cir.1987), [cert. denied, 485 U.S. 977, 108 S.Ct. 1271, 99 L.Ed.2d 482 (1988)]. The trial court’s order is replete with “argumentative overdetailed partisan matter.” Roberts v. Ross, 344 F. 2d 747 (3d Cir. 1965). The better practice, indeed the preferred practice, is for the trial cou…
• Anderson v. Dep't OF Health & Human Servs., 907 F.2d 936 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …dered the issue have concluded that § 1905 does not qualify as an Exemption 3 statute. E.g., CNA Financial Corp. v. Donovan, 830 F. 2d 1132, 1138 (D.C.Cir.1987) (Section 1905 does not satisfy either of the requirements of Exemption 3), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 977, 108 S.Ct. 1270, 99 L.Ed.2d 481 (1988); Florida Medical Ass’n v. United States Dept. of Health, Education & Welfare, 479 F.Supp. 1291, 1302 (M.D.Fla.1979); United Technologies Corp. v. Marshall, 464 F.Supp. 845, 851 (D.Conn.1979); St. Mary’s Hospita…
• DOW Jones & Co., Inc. v. Dep't of Just., 917 F.2d 571 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
  …temporary consultant is irrelevant; the pertinent element is the role, if any, that the document plays in the process of agency deliberations.’ ” Id. at 1122 (quoting CNA Financial Corp. v. Donovan, 830 F. 2d 1132, 1161 (D.C.Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 977, 108 S.Ct. 1270, 99 L.Ed.2d 481 (1988)). Ryan (and Formaldehyde), then, stand for the proposition that Exemption 5 permits an agency to protect the confidentiality of communications from outside the agency so long as those communications are part a…