WHITTINGTON
v.
CUNNAGIN, LAUREL COUNTY ATTORNEY, ON BEHALF OF ENGLERT, ET AL.
WHITTINGTON
CUNNAGIN, LAUREL COUNTY ATTORNEY, ON BEHALF OF ENGLERT, ET AL.
485 U.S. 979
Supreme Court of the United States (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Whittington v. Milby, 928 F.2d 188 (6th Cir. 1991)…stated the judgment of the trial court, finding that service had been attempted in good faith and that the lower court’s exercise of jurisdiction was proper. We refer the reader to that decision, published at 737 S.W. 2d 676 (Ky.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 979, 108 S.Ct. 1276, 99 L.Ed.2d 487 (1988), for a fuller recitation of the pertinent facts. In January of 1989, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, Mr. Whittington filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of K…
-
McARDLE v. Tronetti, 961 F.2d 1083 (3d Cir. 1992)…its. See, e.g., Daloia v. Rose, 849 F. 2d 74 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 898, 109 S.Ct. 242, 102 L.Ed.2d 231 (1988) (witness immunity applies to pretrial adversarial proceedings); Holt v. Castaneda, 832 F. 2d 123 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 979, 108 S.Ct. 1275, 99 L.Ed.2d 486 (1988) (same); Anthony v. Baker, 767 F. 2d 657, 663 (10th Cir.1985) (no witness immunity for grand jury testimony). The Supreme Court has held recently, however, that prosecutors are absolutely immune from § 1983 li…