SHIMODA, ADMINISTRATOR, OAHU COMMUNITY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, ET AL.

v.

AKAO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Haliburton v. State, 561 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 1990)
  …defense in fact succeeded in commenting upon the absence of Lee’s testimony.2 The purpose of closing argument is to help the jury understand the issues by applying the evidence to the law. Hill v. State, 515 So. 2d 176, 178 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 993, 108 S.Ct. 1302, 99 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988). Thus, the purpose of closing argument is disserved when comment upon irrelevant matters is permitted. In State v. Michaels, 454 So. 2d 560, 562 (Fla.1984), we said that [wjhen such witnesses are equally avail…
• Hill v. State, 921 So. 2d 579 (Fla. 2006)
  …motion for postconviction relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution. The factual background and procedural history of this case are set forth in Hill v. State, 515 So. 2d 176 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 993, 108 S.Ct. 1302, 99 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988). Since that decision, we have reviewed this case a number of times. We denied Hill’s first habeas petition and motion for postconviction relief, Hill v. Dugger, 556 So. 2d 1385 (Fla.1990), affirmed Hill’s sente…
• Williams v. State, 638 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
  …an impartial jury meaningful, cause challenges must be granted if there is a basis for any reasonable doubt as to the juror’s ability to be fair. Moore v. State, 525 So. 2d 870, 872 (Fla.1988); Hill v. State, 477 So. 2d 553 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 993, 108 S.Ct. 1302, 99 L.Ed.2d 512 (1988); Singer, 109 So. 2d at 23; Chapman v. State, 593 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); King v. State, 622 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Auriemme v. State, 501 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), rev. denied, 506 So. 2d 1…