WILLIAM L. R. HARMON, PETITIONER,

v.

GORDON MACCALLA, COUNTY SOLICITOR, POLK COUNTY, BARTOW, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Flesche v. Interstate Warehouse & U. S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 411 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …the first hearing, he should be precluded from proving that he is unable to do so at the time of his modification hearing, because such proof does not establish a “change in condition.” We find the language of Mr. Justice Ervin in Arnold v. Stroud, 221 So. 2d 729 (Fla.1969), particularly appropriate in disposing of this point (Id. at 731): . . . [T]he evidence presented in support of modification indicates the transpiration of events cogently indicative of the incapability of the prior determination with th…
• E. Manor Med. Care Ctr. & Ranger Ins. Co. v. Stevens, 437 So. 2d 721 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …ial of compensation and medical benefits was properly entered so as to conform the benefits awarded to the “existing realities” of the claimant’s disability, consistent with the purposes sought to be accomplished by Section 440.28. Arnold v. Stroud, 221 So. 2d 729, 731-732 (Fla.1969). The order appealed from is AFFIRMED. ERVIN, C.J., and MILLS, J., concur.…
• Lane v. Pipeline Constr. Co., 246 So. 2d 742 (Fla. 1971)
  …15 per cent was due to the industrial accident which triggered the pre-existing condition that had been non-disabling before the accident but made .it become disabling as it has been since December 15, 1967. As was stated in Arnold v. Stroud, Fla., 221 So. 2d 729, modifications in workmen’s compensation cases fix a two-year period to re-evaluate the original findings and correct mistakes of fact and provide for change of conditions. There, we noted the Judge of Industrial Claims originally found the claimant…