FERGUSON

v.

DONALDSON, JUDGE, SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL COURT

Citator

Cited By

• Drywall Tapers AND Pointers OF Greater NEW York v. Local 530 OF Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons Int'l Ass'n, 889 F.2d 389 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …the contempt proceedings, there is no denial of due process. United States v. Handler, 476 F. 2d 709, 713 (2d Cir.1973); see also In re Grand Jury Witness [Arambulo], 835 F. 2d 437, 441 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied sub nom. Arambulo v. United States, 485 U.S. 1039, 108 S.Ct. 1602, 99 L.Ed.2d 917 (1988) (“... those constitutional due process protections afforded a contemnor facing prison are not perceived to be necessary to the same degree to a civil contemnor not facing that prospect.”) [*395] 3. Local Rule 4…
• In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 955 F.2d 670 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …imposition of coercive sanctions by way of fines is generally an area in which appellate courts must rely heavily on the informed exercise of the district court’s discretion,” In re Grand Jury Witness, 835 F. 2d 437, 443 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1039, 108 S.Ct. 1602, 99 L.Ed.2d 917 (1988), we are reluctant to find unreasonableness or arbitrariness in the absence of clear abuse. We have completely examined the record in this case. The district court’s seven-day fine period of $1000.00 per day wa…
• Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants, 959 F.2d 1468 (9th Cir. 1992)
  …either against the [opposing party] or result in a holding that the district court abused its discretion [*1482] in imposing the sanction.” In re Grand Jury Witness, 835 F. 2d 437, 443 (2nd Cir.1987), cert. denied sub nom. Arambulo v. United States, 485 U.S. 1039, 108 S.Ct. 1602, 99 L.Ed.2d 917 (1988). In any event, were we to conclude that $10,000 per day was insufficient to coerce compliance, the appropriate solution would seem to be to remand the case to the district court so that it can increase the sa…