SHARP ELECTRONICS CORP.

v.

BUSINESS ELECTRONICS CORP.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• W.S. Badcock Corp. v. Webb, 699 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
  …etermines that the named plaintiffs have [*861] standing should it address the question of whether the named plaintiffs have representative capacity, as defined by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a), to assert the rights of others), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005, 108 S.Ct. 1729, 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (U.S.Fla.1988); see also Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Demario, 683 So. 2d 641, 643 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (court determined inter alia that if the putative class representative has no standing, he has no right to purs…
• Ferreiro v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., 928 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
  …opportunity to consider and rule upon this issue. Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F. 2d 1476, 1482 (11th Cir.1987)(holding that a court may address whether the plaintiff has representative capacity only after determining the issue of standing), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005, 108 S.Ct. 1729, 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988). For the same rea [*377] sons, we do not address issues regarding the scope of the purported class or the merits of the class action. To satisfy the requirement of standing, the plaintiff must show that a cas…
• Joe Church v. City OF Huntsville, 30 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …ctice, “ ‘even if the persons described in the class definition would have standing themselves to sue.’” Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F. 2d 1476, 1483 (11th Cir.1987) (quoting Brown v. Sibley, 650 F. 2d 760, 771 (5th Cir. Unit A July 1981)), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1005, 108 S.Ct. 1729, 100 L.Ed.2d 193 (1988). The complaint does not allege that any named plaintiff has lost shelter in the past as a result of the City’s enforcement of its building code or zoning ordinance. Nor is there any allegation in the complai…