SPENCER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (76 total)

• ITT Real Est. Equities, Inc. v. Chandler Ins. Agency, Inc., 617 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …personally known information to be authentic, and therefore was admissible as party admission); United States v. Ingraham, 832 F. 2d 229, 236 (1st Cir.1987) (telephone calls may be authenticated by exclusively circumstantial evidence), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009, 108 S.Ct. 1738, 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988). Under the circumstances of this case, we hold that it was an abuse of discretion to exclude the proffered documents from evidence. We therefore reverse and remand for further appropriate proceedings. REVERS…
• United States v. Ilario M.A. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …jury could permissibly have found it, viewing the record in the light most congenial to the prosecution, and drawing all reasonable inferences in the government’s favor. See United States v. Ingraham, 832 F. 2d 229, 230 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1009, 108 S.Ct. 1738, 100 L.Ed.2d 202 (1988); United States v. Cintolo, 818 F. 2d 980, 983 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 913, 108 S.Ct. 259, 98 L.Ed.2d 216 (1987). The evidence indicated that the surveilled premises were used as the headquarters fo…
• United States v. Calderon, 127 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …d on juror irregularities has been historically treated in this circuit as a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. See United States v. Bolinger, 837 F. 2d 436, 439 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. De La Fuente v. United States, 486 U.S. 1009, 108 S.Ct. 1737, 100 L.Ed.2d 200 (1988). That, however, does not mean that appellants automatically have two years within which to file such a motion. It is more than obvious that, by its very terms, a motion for a new trial based upon newly disco…