PITTSTON COAL GROUP ET AL.

v.

SEBBEN ET AL.; MCLAUGHLIN, SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL. V. SEBBEN ET AL.; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR V. BROYLES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1989)
  …of the centrality of the exclusive tribal jurisdiction provision to the overall scheme of the ICWA, as well as the conflict between this decision of the Mississippi Supreme Court and those of several other state courts,14 we granted plenary review. 486 U. S. 1021 (1988).15 We now reverse. [*42] r — i I — I Tribal jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings is not a novelty of the ICWA. Indeed, some of the ICWA’s jurisdictional provisions have a strong basis in pre-ICWA case law in the federal and sta…
• Mesa v. California, 489 U.S. 121 (U.S. 1989)
  …writ of mandamus ordering the District Court to deny the United States’ petitions for removal and remand the prosecutions for trial in the California state courts. We granted the United States’ petition for certiorari on behalf of Mesa and Ebrahim, 486 U. S. 1021 (1988), to resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals concerning the proper interpretation of § 1442(a)(1). We now affirm. h-4 The removal provision at issue in this case, 28 U. S. C. § 1442(a), provides: “A civil action or criminal prosecut…
• Nw. Cent. Pipeline Corp. v. State Corp. Comm'n of Kan., 489 U.S. 493 (U.S. 1989)
  …ucers. It held that as a regulation of producers, aimed primarily at the production of gas rather than at its marketing, paragraph (p), as amended, was not pre-empted. 240 Kan. 638, 645-646, 732 P. 2d 775, 780 (1987). We noted probable jurisdiction, 486 U. S. 1021 (1988), and now affirm. II Congress has the power under the Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the Constitution to pre-empt state law. Determining whether it has exercised this power requires that we examine congressional intent. In the absence of…