RUSSO
v.
UNITED STATES; PERSICO V. UNITED STATES; PERSICO ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CATALDO V. UNITED STATES; AND MCINTOSH V. UNITED STATES
RUSSO
UNITED STATES; PERSICO V. UNITED STATES; PERSICO ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CATALDO V. UNITED STATES; AND MCINTOSH V. UNITED STATES
486 U.S. 1022
Supreme Court of the United States (1988)
Caution
Cited by 23 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (23 total)
-
State v. Heckman, 644 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)…erse condemnation under these facts, rely on three cases from other jurisdictions: Gaughen v. Commonwealth Dept. of Transportation, 123 Pa.Cmwlth. 550, 554 A. 2d 1008 (1989); Orion Corp. v. State, 109 Wash.2d 621, 747 P. 2d 1062 (1987) cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022, 108 S.Ct. 1996, 100 L.Ed.2d 227 (1988); and Roth v. State Hwy. Comm’n, 688 S.W. 2d 775 (Mo.Ct.App.1985). These cases are all distinguishable from the present case in two respects: first, because in each of these cases the property owners did not gi…
-
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 490 U.S. 680 (U.S. 1989)….” Ibid. Finally, the court noted that the compelling governmental interest in “the maintenance of a sound and uniform tax system” counseled against granting a free exercise exemption. Id., at 852-853. We granted certiorari, 485 U. S. 1005 (1988); 486 U. S. 1022 (1988), to resolve a Circuit conflict concerning the validity of charitable deductions for auditing and training payments.5 We now affirm. II For over 70 years, federal taxpayers have been allowed to deduct the amount of contributions or gifts to…
-
United States v. Starrett, 55 F.3d 1525 (11th Cir. 1995)…eriod is measured from the time the crime is completed. Id. Because the “crime” proscribed by § 1962(c) is “the individual patterns of racketeering engaged in by a defendant,” United States v. Persico, 832 F. 2d 705, 714 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1022, 108 S.Ct. 1995, 100 L.Ed.2d 227 (1988), the crime is completed, and thus the statute of limitations begins to run, “from the date of the last act of racketeering activity alleged in the indictment and proved at trial.” United States v. Bethea 672 F…
Previewing 3 of 23 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence