STATE EX REL. DADE COUNTY OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION

v.

SOUTH MIAMI VISION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• State of Fla. ex rel. Robert C. Seal v. Shepard, 299 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
  …ad and considered all of the cases cited by respondent and it is easy to understand how he was misled thereby. However, each of those cases predated Waller v. State, Fla.App.2d 1968, 213 So. 2d 623, certiorari denied by the Supreme Court of Florida, 221 So. 2d 749; reversed and remanded by the Supreme Court of the United States, 397 U.S. 387, [*645] 90 S.Ct. 1184, 25 L.Ed.2d 435; again reconsidered by the Second District, 270 So. 2d 26; certiorari denied by the Supreme Court of Florida, 276 So. 2d 489; certio…
• State v. Hart, 253 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)
  …the state court action rested ‘was based on the same acts of the appellant as were involved in the violation of the two city ordinances.’ * * * ^ * * “A petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida was denied, Waller v. State, 221 So. 2d 749 (1968). It is reasonable to assume that the Florida trial court and the District Court of Appeal considered themselves bound by the doctrine of Theisen v. McDavid, 34 Fla. 440, 16 So. 321, which at that time was being reasserted in Hilliard v. City…
• Waller v. Florida, 397 U.S. 387 (U.S. 1970)
  …e city court and for the crime in the proper state court. Conviction or acquittal in either does not bar prosecution in the other.’ ” (Emphasis added.) A petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida was denied, Waller v. State, 221 So. 2d 749 (1968). It is reasonable to assume that the Florida trial court and the District Court of Appeal considered themselves bound by the doctrine of Theisen v. McDavid, 34 Fla. 440, 16 So. 321, which at that time was being reasserted in Hilliard v. City…

Authorities Cited

• State of Fla. ex rel. Dade Cnty. Optometric Ass'n, Inc. v. S. Miami Vision Serv., 209 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)