JAMES ARTHUR MCKENDREE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hauser v. Urchisin, 231 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1970)
  …BOYD, Judge. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, to review the decision reported at 221 So. 2d 752. Conflict is alleged with the decision of this Court in McNayr v. Kelly.1 Petitioner is a member of the City Commission of Deerfield Beach. Respondent [*7] was city prosecutor. The City Commission, during its regular meeting, abolished the position…
• Bishop v. Wometco Enters., Inc., 235 So. 2d 759 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
  …ate would not constitute a libel, per se.2 See: Abram v. Odham, Fla.1956, 89 So. 2d 334; Gibson v. Maloney, Fla. 1970, 231 So. 2d 823; Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374, 87 S.Ct. 534, 17 L.Ed.2d 456. “See generally” Urchisin v. Hauser, Fla. App.1969, 221 So. 2d 752, rev. Hauser v. Urchisin, Fla.1970, 231 So. 2d 6. The authorities enunciated by the Supreme Court of the United States in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686, are applicable to this cause. From his own testimon…
• Vill. of Palm Springs v. F & F Constr. Corp., 41 Fla. Supp. 144 (Palm Beach Cty. Cir. Ct. 1974)
  …t “executive officials of government are absolutely privileged as to defamatory publications made in connection with the performance of duties and responsibilities of their office . . .” (Emphasis added.) Likewise, Urchison v. Hauser, (4th DCA 1969) 221 So. 2d 752, held — “The Supreme Court extended the absolute privilege doctrine to executive officials of government where the defamatory publications, aré made in connection with the performance of the duties and responsibilities of their office (Emphasis add…

Authorities Cited

• Coleman v. State, 215 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)
• Mobley v. State, 215 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)