BURNLEY, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL.

v.

RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSN. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1989)
  …at the majority’s approach was “overly mechanistic” and “contrary to the case-by-case determination of reasonable articulable suspicion based on all the facts.” Id., at 1426. [*7] We granted certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 486 U. S. 1042 (1988), because of its serious implications for the enforcement of the federal narcotics laws. We now reverse. The Court of Appeals held that the DEA agents seized respondent when they grabbed him by the arm and moved him back onto the sidewalk. 83…
• Osterneck v. Ernst & Whinney, 489 U.S. 169 (U.S. 1989)
  …ons of the District Court which indicated that the January 30, 1985, judgment' was final and appealable notwithstanding the pending motion for prejudgment interest. 825 F. 2d, at 1527-1528. Petitioners sought review here, and we granted certiorari, 486 U. S. 1042 (1988), to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeals over whether a motion for prejudgment interest filed after the entry of judgment constitutes a Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend the judgment. Cf. Jenkins v. Whittaker Corp., 785 F. 2d 720 (CA…
• United States v. Boylan, 898 F.2d 230 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …burden is on appellants “to make a strong showing of prejudice” in order to gain a new trial. United States v. Porter, 764 F. 2d 1, 12 (1st Cir.1985) (listing cases); see also United States v. Cresta, 825 F. 2d 538, 554 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1042, 108 S.Ct. 2033, 100 L.Ed.2d 618 (1988); Luna, 585 F. 2d at 4; United States v. Smolar, 557 F. 2d 13, 21 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866, 98 S.Ct. 203, 54 L.Ed.2d 143 (1977). In this context, “prejudice means more than just a better chance of…