MILLWOOD

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Skinner v. Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n, 489 U.S. 602 (U.S. 1989)
  …held that “the government’s compelling need to assure railroad safety by controlling drug use among railway personnel outweighs the need to protect privacy interests.” Id., at 596. We granted the federal parties’ petition for a writ of certio-rari, 486 U. S. 1042 (1988), to consider whether the regulations invalidated by the Court of Appeals violate the Fourth Amendment. We now reverse. II The Fourth Amendment provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effec…
• United States v. Sullivan, 919 F.2d 1403 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …iracy trial because they are “tools of the trade” for those engaged in illegal drug activity. See, e.g., United States v. Crespo de Llano, 838 F. 2d 1006, 1018 (9th Cir.1987); United States v. Cresta, 825 F. 2d 538, 554 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1042, 108 S.Ct. 2033, 100 L.Ed.2d 618 (1988); United States v. Martinez, 808 F. 2d 1050 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1032, 107 S.Ct. 1962, 95 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987); United States v. Rodriguez, 765 F. 2d 1546 (11th Cir.1985). Without accepting this bro…
• United States v. Sabatino, 943 F.2d 94 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …1st Cir.1973). Incidental prejudice, such as that which is almost always encountered when multiple defendants playing different roles are tried together, will not suffice. United States v. Cresta, 825 F. 2d 538, 554-555 (1st Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1042, 108 S.Ct. 2033, 100 L.Ed.2d 618 (1988). Finally, we note that the joinder clearly satisfied the requirements of Fed.R.Crim.P. 8(b), since both defendants were alleged to have participated in the same series of acts or transactions constituting the…