VAN ORSOW

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Simanonok v. Germaine B. Simanonok, 918 F.2d 947 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
  …sovereign immunity. Simanonok’s claims against the federal defendants in their official capacities, which are in effect suits brought against the United States itself, Amoco Production Co. v. Hodel, 815 F. 2d 352, 359 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234, 108 S.Ct. 2898, 101 L.Ed.2d 932 (1988), must proceed in the forum and manner allowed by the sovereign for that purpose. Here the forum is prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), which provides concurrent jurisdiction between the district courts and t…
• United States v. Arlin Ernest Wright, Jr., 991 F.2d 1182 (4th Cir. 1993)
  …he barn were admissible to support the search warrant. The inclusion of tainted evidence does not invalidate a search warrant if enough untainted evidence supports it under United States v. Whitehorn, 813 F. 2d 646, 649 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1234, 108 S.Ct. 2898, 101 L.Ed.2d 931 (1988). There was sufficient untainted evidence to support the warrant. B Next, Wright contends that the court erred by admitting into evidence his statement that he owned the Mossberg rifle. Wright asserts that he…