HUTTER NORTHERN TRUST ET AL.

v.

CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Harbin v. Burlington N. R.R. Co., 921 F.2d 129 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …lson v. Chicago, Milw., St. P., & Pac. R.R. Co., 841 F. 2d 1347, 1353 (7th Cir.1988) (“[t]he evidence required for a finding of negligence [under the FELA] dictates a corresponding ‘slightest’ hurdle for avoiding” summary judgment), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1244, 109 S.Ct. 1, 101 L.Ed.2d 953 (1988); Lancaster v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 773 F. 2d 807, 820 (7th Cir.1985) (“the plaintiff in an FELA case can get to the jury with even slight evidence of negligence”), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 945, 107 S.Ct. 1602, 94…
• Deutsch v. Burlington N. R.R. Co., 983 F.2d 741 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …e must go to a jury “when there is even slight evidence of negligence.” Harbin v. Burlington Northern R. Co., 921 F. 2d 129, 131 (7th Cir.1990). See also Wilson v. Chicago, Milw., St. P., & P.R. Co., 841 F. 2d 1347, 1353 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1244, 109 S.Ct. 1, 101 L.Ed.2d 953 (1988). If plaintiff meets that threshold, the issues go to the trier of fact. See Rogers v. Missouri P.R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 506, 77 S.Ct. 443, 448, 1 L.Ed.2d 493 (1957). The district court found Deutsch did not meet h…
• Lowden v. The Atchison Topeka & Santa FE Ry., 937 F.2d 491 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …rather than a discharged employee when injured, the important inquiry focuses on scope of employment rather than existence of the relationship. In Wilson v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, & Pac. R.R. Co., 841 F. 2d 1347 (7th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1244, 109 S.Ct. 1, 101 L.Ed.2d 953 (1988), plaintiff was injured during a drive away from the work site, during which plaintiff might have been looking for his supervisor or checking on repairs to his van, which had been used to transport employees to wo…