AMERICAN MANAGEMENT & AMUSEMENT, INC.

v.

BARONA GROUP OF THE CAPITAN GRANDE BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

Citator

Cited By

• In re Hall v. Hall, 939 F.2d 802 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …h Cir.1990). Moreover, we have approved a district court’s withdrawing reference nunc pro tunc to justify deciding a non-core matter. See Mission Indians v. American Management & Amusement, Inc., 840 F. 2d 1394, 1399 (9th Cir.1987), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1247, 109 S.Ct. 7, 101 L.Ed.2d 958 (1988). However, even if withdrawal can be found by implication, there still must be some “cause shown” for the withdrawal. See 28 U.S.C. § 157(d) (1988). The district court did not declare any cause for a withdrawal o…
• Sohappy v. Hodel, 911 F.2d 1312 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …ot rely on this rule of construction in invalidating the Secretary’s regulation. Likewise, in Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. American Management & Amusement, Inc., 840 F. 2d 1394, 1405 (9th Cir.1987), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1247, 109 S.Ct. 7, 101 L.Ed.2d 958 (1988), we upheld a district court’s refusal to defer to a BIA interpretation of 25 U.S.C. § 81, which governs contracts involving the private use of Indian lands. The court found that the BIA’s interpretation was "dire…
• Wauchope v. United States Dep't OF State, 985 F.2d 1407 (9th Cir. 1993)
  …ay in the assertion of a known right and (2) the party asserting laches has been .prejudiced.” Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians v. American Management & Amusement, Inc., 840 F. 2d 1394, 1407 (9th Cir.1988), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1247, 109 S.Ct. 7, 101 L.Ed.2d 958 (1988); see also Trustees for Alaska Laborers v. Ferrell, 812 F. 2d 512, 518 (9th Cir.1987). Here, the plaintiffs are not guilty of inexcusable delay in the assertion of a known right. It was not until 1989 that a cour…