BRIDGE

v.

LYNAUGH, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By

• In re Chateaugay Corp. v. The LTV Corp., 944 F.2d 997 (2d Cir. 1991)
  ….S.D.N.Y.1986) 1; cf. Grady v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc., 839 F. 2d 198, 203 (4th Cir.) (user of Daikon shield had claim subject to automatic stay, but not necessarily dischargeable claim, though injury not apparent from use of shield), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1260, 109 S.Ct. 201, 101 L.Ed.2d 972 (1988); see also In re Edge, 60 B.R. 690 (Bankr.M.D.Tenn.1986) (claim for negligent dental service, though negligence discovered post-petition). In In re UNR Industries, Inc., the Seventh Circuit, in dismissing the…
• In re Carolina Motor Express, Inc. v. Delaware Valley Shippers, 949 F.2d 107 (4th Cir. 1991)
  …high tariff rate, see 49 U.S.C. §§ 11705(b)(3), 10701(a), would constitute a pre-petition contingent, un-liquidated, and disputed claim against the bankruptcy estate. See Grady v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc., 839 F. 2d 198 (4th Cir.1988), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1260, 109 S.Ct. 201, 101 L.Ed.2d 972. As a general unsecured creditor, the complaining shipper would have the right to be paid a pro rata share of his claim along with the carrier's other unsecured creditors. 11 U.S.C. § 726(a)(2), (b). If waiting for…
• United States v. Saffeels, 982 F.2d 1199 (8th Cir. 1992)
  …ould not be free to do in the absence of the amendment to the guidelines. Brown v. First Nat'l Bank in Lenox, 844 F. 2d 580, 582 (8th Cir.) ("one panel of this Court is not at liberty to overrule an opinion filed by another panel”), cert. dismissed, 487 U.S. 1260, 109 S.Ct. 20, 101 L.Ed.2d 971 (1988). Nothing in Saffeels's brief addresses the amendment or even points out that it occurred.…