FITZSIMMONS

v.

FITZSIMMONS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (38 total)

• United States v. North, 910 F.2d 843 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
  …85), or “statements of fact to the jury not supported by proper evidence introduced during trial,” United States v. Perholtz, 842 [*895] F. 2d 343, 360 (D.C.Cir.) (quoting Gaither v. United States, 413 F. 2d 1061, 1079 (D.C.Cir.1969)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 821, 109 S.Ct. 65, 102 L.Ed.2d 42 (1988). When an objection is timely made, such remarks, while improper, are cause for reversal only if they “sufficiently prejudiced” the defendant. United States v. Fowler, 608 F. 2d 2, 12 (D.C.Cir.1979) (quoting Gai…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …, we defer to the trial judge’s broad discretion unless his decision is clearly wrong. See Salem v. United States Lines, 370 U.S. 31, 35, 82 S.Ct. 1119, 1122, 8 L.Ed.2d 313 (1962); United States v. Daly, 842 F. 2d 1380, 1387 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 821, 109 S.Ct. 66, 102 L.Ed.2d 43 (1988). In view of the general background nature of the unob-jected to testimony and the court’s limiting instruction to defense counsel, we see no abuse of discretion in admitting the expert testimony. Bilzerian argue…
• New Castle Cnty. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 933 F.2d 1162 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …asualty Co. v. Armco, Inc., 822 F. 2d 1348 (4th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1008, 108 S.Ct. 703, 98 L.Ed.2d 654 (1988); Continental Insurance Cos. v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co., 842 F. 2d 977 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 821, 109 S.Ct. 66, 102 L.Ed.2d 43 (1988) (“NEPACCO”); Patrons Oxford Mutual Insurance Co. v. Marois, 573 A. 2d 16 (Me.1990).48 [*1186] The Armco case, like this one, involved a declaratory judgment action brought by an insurer to determine whether a sta…