MOORE
v.
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
MOORE
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
488 U.S. 823
Supreme Court of the United States (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Young v. Quinlan, 960 F.2d 351 (3d Cir. 1992)…F. 2d 1229, 1232 (8th Cir.1990); and as the “knowledge ... of a pervasive risk of harm to inmates from other prisoners” and failure to respond reasonably to the risk, Cortes-Quinones v. Jimenez-Nettleship, 842 F. 2d 556, 560 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 823, 109 S.Ct. 68, 102 L.Ed.2d 45 (1988). .To be sure, prison officials are presented with an arduous task when asked to discern legitimate from illegitimate requests for protective custody: [i]n an ideal world, prisoners would request protective cust…
-
Pine Prods. Corp. v. The United States, 945 F.2d 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1991)…artnership, § 1.03(4) (1990) (partners are jointly and severally liable for third party [*1561] obligations and debt chargeable to the partnership); see, e.g., Faison v. Nationwide Mortgage Corp., 839 F. 2d 680 (D.C.Cir.1987), cert. denied sub nom., 488 U.S. 823, 109 S.Ct. 70, 102 L.Ed.2d 46 (1988) (parties to a joint venture would be liable jointly and severally as joint tortfeasors where tort allegedly committed by co-venturer); Tehran-Berkeley Civil and Envtl. Eng’rs v. Tippetts-Abbett-McCarthy-Stratton,…