LAKE NACIMIENTO RANCH CO.

v.

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• City OF Riviera Beach v. Shillingburg, 659 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …ion because the denial of the fence variance “gives no indication of how the city would respond to a major development application.” See also Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 841 F. 2d 872, 876-77 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827, 109 S.Ct. 79, 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988) (finding the submission of an “informal” draft of a development plan for comments by land use agency staff members was not a meaningful application). As the landowners did in Tinnerman, landowners here assert th…
• United States v. Collins, 920 F.2d 619 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …ce to the “alleged ratification” of the sixteenth amendment in the face of uniform contrary authority. See, e.g., Miller v. United [*630] States, 868 F. 2d 236, 241 (7th Cir.1989); United States v. Sitka, 845 F. 2d 43, 46-47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827, 109 S.Ct. 77, 102 L.Ed.2d 54 (1988); United States v. Stahl, 792 F. 2d 1438, 1440-41 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1036, 107 S.Ct. 888, 93 L.Ed.2d 840 (1987); Sisk v. Commissioner, 791 F. 2d 58, 60-61 (6th Cir.1986); see generally United S…
• Harris v. Cnty. OF Riverside, 904 F.2d 497 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …re are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the court correctly applied the relevant substantive law. Lake Nacimiento Ranch Co. v. County of San Luis Obispo, 841 F. 2d 872, 875 (9th Cir.1988), modifying 830 F. 2d 977 (1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 827, 109 S.Ct. 79, 102 L.Ed.2d 55 (1988). The majority of Harris’ claims arise from his allegation that the County took his property without just compensation. The district court concluded that all of these claims were precluded on ripeness grounds. Ha…