LEWIS

v.

LANE, DIRECTOR, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• State v. Mozo, 655 So. 2d 1115 (Fla. 1995)
  …eting or any electronic communication. The actual “interception” of a communication occurs not where such is ultimately heard or recorded but where the communication originates. See United States v. Nelson, 837 F. 2d 1519 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829, 109 S.Ct. 82, 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988). Here, the “intercepted” conversations originated within the Mozos’ home and thus exhibited the required expectation of privacy demanded by section 934.02(2). It is a well-established principle that citizens are…
• Thompson v. State, 731 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
  …inated in Illinois. See State v. Mozo, 655 So. 2d 1115, 1117 (Fla.1995) (holding that interception of an electronic communication occurs where the communication originates); see also United States v. Nelson, 837 F. 2d 1519 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829, 109 S.Ct. 82, 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988). According to Mr. Thompson, the state was barred from using the recording as evidence in his prosecution because the Titusville police department failed to give notice to the State Attorney in the county where Mr…
• Hentz v. State, 62 So. 3d 1184 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …ne conversations, the court explained: The actual “interception” of a communication occurs not where such is ultimately heard or recorded but where the communication originates. See United States v. Nelson, 837 F. 2d 1519 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829, 109 S.Ct. 82, 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988). Here, the “intercepted” conversations originated within the Mozos’ home and thus exhibited the required expectation of privacy demanded by section 934.02(2). It is a well-established principle that citizens are…