L. C. CRAWFORD, PETITIONER,
v.
HONORABLE LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS AND EX OFFICIO WARDEN, FLORIDA STATE PRISON, RAIFORD, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
L. C. CRAWFORD, PETITIONER,
HONORABLE LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS AND EX OFFICIO WARDEN, FLORIDA STATE PRISON, RAIFORD, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
222 So. 2d 188
Florida Supreme Court (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner seeks to have this Court review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, reported at State ex rel. Crawford v. Wainwright, 213 So.2d 755. That decision was rendered August 27, 1968 and rehearing was denied September 19, 1968. The petition for writ of certiorari was filed in this Court November 19, 1968, a Tuesday, and the sixty-first (61st) day after denial of rehearing. It, thus, fails to meet the sixty-day filing requirement applicable to decisions rendered prior to October 1, 1968. In re Florida Appellate Rules, 211 So.2d 198, 201 (Fla.1968).
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed sua sponte.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Joffre E. Turner v. Keller Kitchen Cabinets, 247 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 1971)
-
Pressley v. Louie L. Wainwright, 367 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 1979)…ssley had been denied due process or equal protection, but apparently adopted the federal district court’s conclusion to that effect. 540 F. 2d at 821 n.11. . See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Shevin, 354 So. 2d 372, 374 (Fla.1977). . Crawford v. Wainwright, 222 So. 2d 188 (Fla.1969). See also State ex rel. Kovnot v. Ferguson, 313 So. 2d 710 (Fla.1975). . See Lake v. Lake, 103 So. 2d 639 (Fla.1958), which explains that in Florida every litigant is entitled to one appeal as a matter of right and that, unless the case…1 / 2
-
Wainwright v. Wainwright, Inc., 237 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 1970)…claim was barred for failure to file within two years after the last payment of compensation or the last remedial attention or treatment was provided by the employer. Fla.Stat, §§ 440.13(3) (b) and 440.19(1) (a), F.S.A. See Troyer v. Burnup & Sims, 222 So. 2d 188 (Fla.1969). The order of the Judge of Industrial Claims as affirmed by the Full Commission was correct. The writ of certiorari is denied. It is so ordered. DREW, THORNAL and BOYD, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., dissents with Opinion. MANN, District…
Authorities Cited
- In re Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 211 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1968)
- State of Fla. ex rel. L. C. Crawford v. Honorable Louie L. Wainwright, 213 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)