TAYLOR

v.

SMITH, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Emiro Miguel Passos-Paternina, 918 F.2d 979 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …s which may lend support to a reasonable inference that [*985] a defendant aboard a vessel had knowledge that the cargo included controlled substances: the size of the vessel, e.g., United States v. Robinson, 843 F. 2d 1, 8 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 834, 109 S.Ct. 93,102 L.Ed.2d 69 (1988); the condition of the vessel, e.g., Guerrero Guerrero, 776 F. 2d at 1075; the number of crew members, e.g., United States v. Molinares Chares, 822 F. 2d 1213, 1219 (1st Cir.1987); the relationships among the crew…
• United States v. Piedrahita-Santiago, 931 F.2d 127 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …eering the vessel. See, e.g., Victoria, 876 F. 2d at 1011 (larger crew than needed for ordi [*131] nary fishing); United States v. Robinson, 843 F. 2d 1, 9 (1st Cir.) (court inferred purpose of large crew was to load and unload cargo), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 834, 109 S.Ct. 93, 102 L.Ed.2d 69 (1988); Potes, 880 F. 2d at 1478 (larger crew than necessary for shrimping). Second, the vessel was carrying a large quantity of marijuana — 131 bales totalling approximately 9,984 lbs. — which, although concealed, was…
• United States v. Maravilla, 907 F.2d 216 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …ding that when defendants knew that their conduct was unlawful, the fact that they did not know that the United States would prosecute them for it did not mean that they lacked “fair notice” under due process or ex post facto clauses), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 834, 109 S.Ct. 93, 102 L.Ed.2d 69 (1988). We assume that courts, in the past, have interpreted the word “inhabitant” to cover a range of different relationships between a person and a place. See, e.g., Walnut v. Wade, 103 U.S. 683, 694, 26 L.Ed. 526 (…