HAMM

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Alberto Castro (89-1528), 908 F.2d 85 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …ants against whom the government introduced the statements were participants in the conspiracy, and the statements were made in the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy. United States v. Curro, 847 F. 2d 325, 329 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 843, 109 S.Ct. 116, 102 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988). In this case, the parties neglected to request and the district court neglected to make such a finding. It is error for the trial court to have failed to make the required Enright determination, and therefore…
• United States v. Lang, 904 F.2d 618 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …9 U.S. 1085, 107 S.Ct. 1288, 94 L.Ed.2d 145 (1987); United States v. Walker, 696 F. 2d 277, 280-81 (4th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891, 104 S.Ct. 234, 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); United States v. Curro, 847 F. 2d 325, 327 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 843, 109 S.Ct. 116, 102 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988); United States v. Guinan, 836 F. 2d 350 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1218, 108 S.Ct. 2871, 101 L.Ed.2d 907 (1988); United States v. Carlson, 547 F. 2d 1346, 1352-60 (8th Cir.1976), [*623] cert. denied, 431…
• United States v. Gomez-Lemos, 939 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1991)
  …o make such testimony admissible at trial if the witness is not available to testify there. Unlike my colleagues, I am not sure that this question remains an open one in our circuit. In United States v. Curro, 847 F. 2d 325 (6th Cir), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 843, 109 S.Ct. 116, 102 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988), a decision published two years after Lee v. Illinois, we upheld a criminal conviction despite the introduction at trial of testimony given before a grand jury by a witness (a convicted felon named Louzon) who l…

  ← 1 / 2 →