FINNEGAN

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Teague, 953 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …ical standard does not necessarily constitute denial of Sixth Amendment guarantee of assistance of counsel); see also TEW v. Arky, Freed, Stearns, et al., P.A., 655 F.Supp. 10573, 1575 (S.D.Fla. 1987), aff'd, 846 F. 2d 753 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 854, 109 S.Ct. 142, 102 L.Ed.2d 114 (1988) (attorney disciplinary rules not designed to be basis for civil liability or create private cause of action); Miami Int’l Realty Co. v. Paynter, 841 F. 2d 348 (10th Cir.1988) (violation of code of professional…
• Caro-Galvan v. Curtis Richardson, Inc., 993 F.2d 1500 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …2, 109 S.Ct. 1026, 1031, 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989); Brock, 843 F. 2d at 1166. AWPA is a remedial statute and should be construed broadly to effect its humanitarian purpose. Bracamontes v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 840 F. 2d 271, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 854, 109 S.Ct. 141, 102 L.Ed.2d 113 (1988); see Soliz, 615 F. 2d at 275 (“[B]road construction of the Act ‘comports with the Act’s humanitarian purpose to protect all those hired by middlemen ;to toil in our nation’s fields, vineyards and orchards.’ ”)…
• Schatz v. Rosenberg, 943 F.2d 485 (4th Cir. 1991)
  …ts have refused to base a legal duty of disclosure for section 10(b) on a disciplinary rule. In Tew v. Arky, Freed, Stearns, Watson, Greer, Weaver, & Harris, P.A., 655 F.Supp. 1573 (S.D.Fla.1987), aff'd mem., 846 F. 2d 753 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 854, 109 S.Ct. 142, 102 L.Ed.2d 114 (1988), the court held that violation of a disciplinary rule did not create a legal duty requiring a law firm to disclose information it had learned in a prior business meeting to a client’s auditors. The rationale f…