BRYCE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …ional participation in a scheme to defraud a person of money or property, and (2) use of the mails in furtherance of the scheme.” United States v. Simon, 839 F. 2d 1461, 1465 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1223, 108 S.Ct. 2883, 101 L.Ed.2d 917, 488 U.S. 861, 109 S.Ct. 158, 102 L.Ed.2d 129 (1988).5 To prove aiding and abetting under 18 U.S. C.A. § 2, the Government must show beyond a reasonable doubt “that the defendant (1) associated himself with the crime, (2) intended to bring it about, and (3) sough…
• Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (U.S. 2002)
  …of justice.’ ” (quoting Offutt v. United States, 348 U. S. 11, 14 (1954))). Because courts control [*818] neither the purse nor the sword, their authority ultimately rests on public faith in those who don the robe. See Mistretta v. United States, 488 U. S. 861, 407 (1989) (“The legitimacy of the Judicial Branch ultimately depends on its reputation for impartiality and nonpartisanship.”). As the Minnesota Supreme Court has recognized, all legal systems — regardless of their method of judicial selection —…
• United States v. Beale, 921 F.2d 1412 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …priate “where the indictment charges multiple defendants with a single conspiracy and also charges some of the defendants with substantive counts arising out of the conspiracy.” United States v. Simon, 839 F. 2d 1461, 1472 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861, 109 S.Ct. 158, 102 L.Ed.2d 129 (1988). The indictment naming COLLADO charges multiple defendants with a single conspiracy and charges some of the defendants, COLLA-DO included, with substantive counts arising out of the conspiracy. Accordingly, we…