A. M. KIGHT
v.
STAR INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
A. M. KIGHT
STAR INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
131 Fla. 775
Florida Supreme Court (1938)
Caution
Also reported at: 179 So. 797
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause is before the Court on a writ of error sued out to an order granting a motion for a new trial. It is a companion case to Kight v. American Eagle Fire Insurance Company of New York this day decided. It is admitted in briefs of counsel for the respective parties, as well as at the bar of this Court by the attorneys when orally argued, that the pleadings, evidence and questions for review here are the same in each case, and the record supports this conclusion. The order of the lower court in granting the motion for a new trial is hereby affirmed.
Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Uhrig v. Redding, 150 Fla. 480 (Fla. 1942)…e question, to my way of thinking, whether any partnership existed. The chancellor, in his opinion, cited Webster v. Clark, 34 Fla. 637, 16 So. 601; Tidewater Construction Co. v. Monroe County, 107 Fla. 648, 146 So. 209, and McConnell v. Karantines, 131 Fla. 775, 180 So. 23. But I think those cases can be distinguished, on the facts, from the case at bar. The foregoing opinion is, I think, sustained by the authorities cited and by others that are not cited. I therefore concur.…
-
Huie v. State, 92 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 1957)…issed the Supreme Court thereupon terminated its jurisdiction on that particular phase of the matter. It became the responsibility of the trial judge to proceed in accordance with the final order of this Court. In Young v. Stoutamire, 131 Fla. 535, 179 So. 797, relied upon by appellant, the habeas corpus proceeding was still pending in and undisposed of by the Supreme Court when the Circuit Judge undertook to impound the -bond money that had been deposited with the Sheriff pursuant to order of the Supreme…
-
Cacciatore v. State, 147 Fla. 758 (Fla. 1941)…rst Nat. Bank v. Gibbs, 78 Fla. 118, 82 So. 618; State ex rel. Allen v. Rose, 123 Fla. 544, 167 So. 21; South Atlantic Steamship Co. v. Tutson, 139 Fla. 405, 190 So. 675; Sweat v. Waldon, 123 Fla. 478, 167 So. 363; Young v. Stoutamire, 131 Fla. 535, 179 So. 797. Arising out of the factual situation as above outlined, the question presented to this Court for a decision is whether or not the order dated January 23, 1941, dismissing the writ of error was erroneous. The case here is not affected by the crimin…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence