SAMAD

v.

ZIMMERMAN, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE INSTITUTION (AND DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION CENTER) AT GRATERFORD, PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Royal W. Hadfield, Jr., 918 F.2d 987 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …the picture’s admission into evidence constitutes a ground for reversal only upon a showing of plain error. See United States v. Hunnewell, 891 F. 2d 955, 956 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Rivera-Medina, 845 F. 2d 12, 17 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 862, 109 S.Ct. 160, 102 L.Ed.2d 131 (1988); United States v. Griffin, 818 F. 2d 97, 99-100 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 844, 108 S.Ct. 137, 98 L.Ed.2d 94 (1987); see generally Fed.R. Evid. 103. Plain error requires a demonstration that justice ha…
• United States v. Devin, 918 F.2d 280 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …pted extortion will have some slight impact on commerce in order to bring it within the statutory sweep. See United States v. McKenna, 889 F. 2d 1168, 1171-72 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Rivera-Medina, 845 F. 2d 12, 15 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 862, 109 S.Ct. 160, 102 L.Ed.2d 131 (1988); DiGregorio, 605 F. 2d at 1190-91. Appellant, although conceding that Stanhope had sufficient contacts with interstate commerce, contends that the government’s proof was inadequate because Gottlieb testified th…
• United States v. Osorio, 929 F.2d 753 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …ng possible bases for impeachment,” United States v. Frappier, 807 F. 2d 257, 259 (1st Cir.1986), cert, denied, 481 U.S. 1006, 107 S.Ct. 1629, 95 L.Ed.2d 203 (1987); see also United States v. Rivera-Medina, 845 F. 2d 12, 16 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 862, 109 S.Ct. 160, 102 L.Ed.2d 131 (1988), the trial judge retains the power under Fed.R.Evid. 611 to control the mode and order of interrogation of witnesses and presentation of evidence. . The question whether Osorio was entitled to a role-in-the-of…