JOHNNIE BELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that while the appointment of joint counsel was not erroneous, the defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claim that his appointed counsel refused to file an appeal.
The defendant was convicted of rape and moved to vacate his sentence, arguing his constitutional rights were violated by having the same court-appoint…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Vacate Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal from an order denying the appellant’s motion to vacate sentence and set aside judgment, arising from Volu-sia County.
The appellant, who is the defendant below, was indicted and tried and convicted of rape along with the codefendant. The codefendant had privately employed counsel and prior to arraignment the appellant requested the court to appoint as his counsel the same lawyer representing the codefendant as private counsel. This was done and said defendant was so represented throughout the trial.
One of the major contentions of the appellant in his motion to vacate is that his constitutional rights were violated because the court appointed the same counsel to represent him that was representing the codefendant. This contention is without merit in view of the decision of this court in Rogers v. State, 212 So.2d 367 (Fla.App.1st, 1968) and Belton v. State, 211 So.2d 238 (Fla.App.3d, 1968) and the trial court committed no error in denying the motion on these grounds. However, the further contention of the appellant in said motion that he requested his court-appointed counsel to institute an appeal from his conviction and that the same was refused, contains sufficient merit to warrant an evidentiary hearing on this point alone.1
Inasmuch as the trial judge’s rulings on the contentions raised in said motion of the appellant are affirmed, with the exception of his contention that his court-appointed counsel refused to appeal his case, we are compelled to reverse for a hearing on this one contention.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith on authority of Coward v. State, 202 So.2d 778 (Fla.App.2d, 1967).
WIGGINTON, C. J., and SPECTOR, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bell v. State, 266 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)…PER CURIAM. Petitioner Bell seeks a writ of mandamus directing the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Volusia County to furnish him with a trial transcript. In Bell v. State, 222 So. 2d 269 (1 Fla.App.1969), this Court reversed this cause for the purpose of the trial court conducting an evidentiary hearing upon Bell’s contention that his court-appointed counsel refused to institute an appeal from the judgment of conviction. Now Bell in…
Authorities Cited
- Jackson v. State, 166 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
- Belton v. State, 211 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Rogers v. State, 212 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)
- Hinton v. State, 177 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
- Coward v. State, 202 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)