CHARLES E. MCCONNELL
v.
J. KARANTINOS

Fla. | 1938-03-11
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur., Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
131 Fla. 775 Florida Supreme Court (1938) Caution
Also reported at: 180 So. 23
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause having been submitted upon the transcript of record, and the briefs and argument of counsel, the court finds no reversible error in the record, and the order appealed from is affirmed upon the authority of Gove v. Nautilus Hotel Company, 68 Fla. 490, 67 So. 112; Tide Water Construction Company v. Monroe County, 107 Fla. 648, 146 So. 209, and Webster v. Clark, 34 Fla. 633, 16 So. 601.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Uhrig v. Redding, 150 Fla. 480 (Fla. 1942)
    …my way of thinking, whether any partnership existed. The chancellor, in his opinion, cited Webster v. Clark, 34 Fla. 637, 16 So. 601; Tidewater Construction Co. v. Monroe County, 107 Fla. 648, 146 So. 209, and McConnell v. Karantines, 131 Fla. 775, 180 So. 23. But I think those cases can be distinguished, on the facts, from the case at bar. The foregoing opinion is, I think, sustained by the authorities cited and by others that are not cited. I therefore concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw