BOUNDS, COMMISSIONER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

v.

SMITH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Saylor v. State, 715 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Waterhouse v. State, 522 So. 2d 341 (Fla.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 869, 109 S.Ct. 178, 102 L.Ed.2d 147 (1988). COBB, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.…
• United States v. North, 910 F.2d 843 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
  …eciprocal discovery by defendant); Mauricio v. Duckworth, 840 F. 2d 454 (7th Cir.) (due process violated when prosecution deliberately leaves name of its alibi rebuttal witness off witness list provided, after court order, to defense), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 869, 109 S.Ct. 177, 102 L.Ed.2d 146 (1988). VIII. JueoR Dishonesty North contends that he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury because a trial juror lied under oath, on both a pretrial jury questionnaire and in a post-trial hearin…
• United States v. Sherlock, 962 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …s not necessarily a Bruton error, that warrants a new trial. Since Richardson, at least one state court has relied upon it in reversing a conviction for a Bruton error. People v. Cruz, 121 Ill.2d 321, 117 Ill.Dec. 907, 521 N.E. 2d 18, cert. denied, 488 U.S. 869, 109 S.Ct. 177, 102 L.Ed.2d 146 (1988). In Cruz, a statement of the nontestifying codefend-ant was admitted with the name of Cruz rea-dacted as well as Cruz's statements. The prosecutor in closing argument encouraged the jurors to consider the codef…