ALEXANDER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Sandstrom v. Chemlawn Corp., 904 F.2d 83 (1st Cir. 1990)
  ….R., 203 F. 2d 510, 513 (3d Cir.1953)); see also United States v. Levasseur, 846 F. 2d 786, 792 (1st Cir.) (observing that the “primary concern of the doctrine of judicial estoppel is to protect the integrity of the judicial process”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 894, 109 S.Ct. 232, 102 L.Ed.2d 222 (1988). By the same token, a fraud on the court requires that a litigant and his lawyer concoct some unconscionable scheme calculated to impair the court’s ability fairly and impartially to adjudicate a dispute. See…
• United States v. Anderson, 921 F.2d 335 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …ent that a statute expressly confers such a right. See United States v. Patterson, 882 F. 2d 595, 597 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 737, 107 L.Ed.2d 755 (1989); United States v. Levasseur, 846 F. 2d 786, 787 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 894, 109 S.Ct. 232, 102 L.Ed.2d 222 (1988); United States v. Kane, 646 F. 2d 4, 5 (1st Cir.1981). Anderson argues that there is no statutory hook on which the government’s appeal can be hung or, alternatively, that the government waived any right of app…
• Steirer v. Bethlehem Area Sch. Dist., 987 F.2d 989 (3d Cir. 1993)
  …s sect, violated 18 U.S.C. § 1584 where they “repeatedly used and threatened to use physical force to make the children [at their camp] perform labor and the children believed they had no viable alternative but to perform such labor”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 894, 109 S.Ct. 234, 102 L.Ed.2d 224 (1988); United States v. Booker, 655 F. 2d 562, 563, 566 (4th Cir.1981) (owners of migrant labor camp held farm workers in involuntary servitude in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1584 where they forbade them from leaving wi…