STAMLER ET AL.

v.

ZAMBONI

Citator

Cited By

• Clay Fryman and Bobby Kinder v. Fed. Crop Ins. Corp., 936 F.2d 244 (6th Cir. 1991)
  …arvis, 923 F. 2d at 61. The courts will not allow a party with unclean hands to prevail on an equitable argument. See Cleveland Newspaper Guild, Local 1, v. The Plain Dealer Publishing Co., 839 F. 2d 1147, 1154-55 (6th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899, 109 S.Ct. 245, 102 L.Ed.2d 234 (1988). Plaintiffs were as much at fault in inviting the error in this case as defendants since all the parties asked for the equivalent of instruction 8. Furthermore, the doctrine of invited error and the cases cite…
• Burns v. Cnty. OF Cambria, 971 F.2d 1015 (3d Cir. 1992)
  …ic employer’s interest in promoting efficiency in public services by controlling whom it employs. See Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 88 S.Ct. 1731, 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); see also Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F. 2d 73 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 899, 109 S.Ct. 245, 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988). The inquiry in those cases generally focuses on whether the speech concerned a matter of public concern and whether it caused unacceptable internal disruption. In Connick the Court held that the speech in ques…
• Burkey v. Gov't Emps. Hosp. Ass'n, 983 F.2d 656 (5th Cir. 1993)
  …96 Cal.App.3d 206, 220, 241 Cal.Rptr. 756, 765 (1987) (discussion OPM’s belief that state law claims should be preempted because the imposition of varying state law requirements would undermine the purpose and objectives of the FEHBA), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899, 109 S.Ct. 245, 102 L.Ed.2d 234 (1988). The Burkeys argue that their state law claim for penalties is not preempted under § 8902(m)(l) because their claim relates to remedies and not to the “nature or extent of coverage or benefits.” No such distin…