HARTENSTINE

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, NORTH DESERT DISTRICT (BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST)

Citator

Cited By

• Versarge v. The Twp. OF Clinton NEW Jersey, 984 F.2d 1359 (3d Cir. 1993)
  …ck, 461 U.S. at 147, 103 S.Ct. at 1689; see also Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F. 2d 73, 77-78 (3d Cir.) (recognizing that speaker’s motivation is relevant to, but not determinative of, [*1365] whether speech is on matter of public concern), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899, 109 S.Ct. 245, 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988); Czurlanis, 721 F. 2d at 103-04, 104 n. 5 (same). We turn to the content, form and context of plaintiffs speech. On its face, the content of plaintiffs speech — whether the Hose Company remodeled the firehouse…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Bd. OF Pub. Educ., 968 F.2d 393 (3d Cir. 1992)
  …694, 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972) (college professor’s legislative testimony and other statements critical of the Board of Regents may be constitutionally protected). Finally, one of our decisions, Zamboni v. Stamler, 847 F. 2d 73 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 899, 109 S.Ct. 245, 102 L.Ed.2d 233 (1988), the case that Sanguigni finds “most analogous” to her own,4 involved speech that was of public concern because it formed part of official proceedings concerning important alleged improprieties by a government…